Reliability and Validity of the Physical Literacy Questionnaire for Chinese Children Aged 4-6 Years

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

The study was to validate the reliability and validity of the Physical Literacy Questionnaire (PL-C Quest) for Chinese children aged 4-6 years. Data were collected from 1677 kindergarten children (864 boys and 813 girls) aged 4-6 years in five cities cross different regions in China. The item analysis was conducted to assess item discrimination. Reliability was assessed through both internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test-retest reliability (ICC). Construct validity was examined using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and subsequently confirmed with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The results revealed that (1) in the item analysis, the t-values of the 30 items ranged from 11.553 to 27.685 (p < 0.05); (2) in the reliability test, the Cronbach’s alpha of the PL-C Quest total assessment was 0.896, and the retest reliability was 0.866, indicating that the questionnaire has high internal consistency and measurement stability; (3) in the validity analysis, EFA validated the four-factor structure of the PL-C Quest, and the results of the CFA indicated a good model fit (χ2/df = 2.985, RMSEA = 0.049, GFI = 0.896). The PL-C Quest has shown good reliability and validity in the assessment of Physical Literacy (PL) for children aged 4-6 years in China. Key words Children, Physical literacy, Physical activity, Reliability, Validity

Article activity feed