Freedoms, Rights, Institutions (FRI): A Tool for Human Rights in Mental Health

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose This community-based, population-level study aimed to validate an instrument for assessing knowledge of human rights and mechanisms for exercising them, and to explore its relationship with subjective well-being and depressive symptoms in Colombia. Methods A total of 622 adults participated in an analytical cross-sectional and population study. Participants completed the Freedoms, Rights, Institutions (FRI): A Tool for Human Rights in Mental Health, alongside validated scales for subjective well-being, resilience, depressive symptoms, loneliness, psychosocial disability, and continuity of care. Results The FRI instrument demonstrated excellent content validity (IVC = 1), high internal consistency (α = 0.987; ω = 0.922), and a robust factorial structure (KMO = 0.968; Bartlett p < .001), revealing two components: recognition of personal rights and freedoms, and institutional participation. Significant correlations were found between human rights knowledge and lower depressive symptoms (ρ = − 0.167; OR = 0.82; p = .030), as well as higher subjective well-being (ρ = 0.088; p < .05). A linear regression model explained 49.4% of the variance in depression, underscoring the protective role of institutional participation. Conclusion These findings support the validity of the FRI instrument and its relevance for designing rights-based mental health interventions. By strengthening individual agency and promoting dignified, participatory environments, this tool offers a pathway for advancing psychosocial recovery and equity in mental health at the population level.

Article activity feed