Electrocardiographic Indices Predicting Disability in Relapsing- Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is increasingly recognized as a systemic disease with cardiovascular involvement. The frontal QRS-T angle (fQRS-T) reflects repolarization heterogeneity and is linked to arrhythmic risk in various conditions; however, its role in MS remains unclear. This study aimed to compare fQRS-T and related electrocardiographic indices between patients with relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS) and healthy controls, and to examine their association with disability severity. Methods: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, 101 RRMS patients and 51 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals were evaluated. RRMS patients were stratified by disability severity using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS <6 vs. ≥6). Resting 12-lead ECGs were assessed for QT, Tp-e, Tp-e/QTc, fQRS-T angle, and indices of cardiac electrophysiological balance (iCEB, iCEBc) by two blinded cardiologists. Statistical analyses included univariate comparisons, logistic regression, and ROC analysis. Results: RRMS patients had significantly greater fQRS-T angles and iCEBc values compared to controls (p<0.05). Within the RRMS cohort, those with EDSS ≥6 exhibited higher fQRS-T and iCEB values (p<0.01). In multivariable analysis, fQRS-T angle (OR 1.036; p=0.010) and iCEB (OR 3.544; p=0.001) independently predicted severe disability. The fQRS-T angle demonstrated moderate diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.718; cut-off 32°). Conclusion: These findings indicate that RRMS patients exhibit subclinical ECG abnormalities that correlate with disability severity, and incorporating ECG-derived metrics into clinical monitoring may aid in risk stratification of RRMS patients with high disability burden. Trial registration: Not applicable; this was a retrospective cross-sectional observational study.

Article activity feed