Evaluation of DNA extraction methods for clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis primary liquid culture for whole-genome sequencing

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has potential for determining the complete drug-resistance profile of clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( Mtb ) strains. Cetyltrimethylammonium-bromide (CTAB), the conventional method for Mtb DNA extraction, is labour-intensive and difficult to implement in routine laboratory settings. This study evaluated the performance of commercial kits to extract DNA from clinical primary liquid cultures (CPC). Mtb- positive decontaminated sputum sediments were pooled and used to inoculate mycobacteria-growth-indicator tubes (MGIT). Positive non-contaminated MGIT cultures were pooled and aliquoted to generate 10 technical replicate isolates for DNA extraction by CTAB method with (+) or without (-) RNAse and nine DNA extraction commercial kits (+/-modifications): Zymo-DNA Clean and Concentrator, Zymo-Quick-DNA Fungal/Bacterial (+ lysozyme-digestion), InstaGene (IGM) +/-RiboLyser Homogeniser (RH), GenoLyse (+/-precipitation), FluoroLyse (+/-precipitation), PrepGEM-Bacterial (+/-precipitation), NucleoSpin-Tissue, NucleoMag-Pathogen, and Gene-Xpert buffer (+ precipitation or + purification). Genomic libraries for WGS were generated using the Illumina DNA-Prep Kit and evaluated for quality using NanoDrop, Qubit-dsDNA/HS and TapeStation assays. Ten performance parameters were evaluated out of a score of 5: quantity of total dsDNA, DNA purity ratio 260/280 and 260/230, PCR potential (targeting the pncA gene, 615 bp), concentration of genomic libraries (ng/µl), library fragment size (bp), mapped percentage, median coverage, turnaround time and cost. A radar chart was used to visualize the scores and calculate the sum of scores for each method (out of 50). The five best-performing methods were: IGM/RH (score = 45), IGM (score = 42), CTAB/RNase (score = 40), GenoLyse/Precipitation (score = 40), FluoroLyse/Precipitation (score = 39), and CTAB (score = 39).

Article activity feed