Effects of Different Ischemic Preconditioning Protocols on Sprint Swimming Speed: A Crossover Study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
This study aimed to analyze the acute effect of different ischemic preconditioning (IPC) protocols on the swimming speed of athletes in a 100-meter freestyle event. This is a crossover clinical trial in which 12 male athletes (16.2 ± 1.5 years), swimmers, were randomly submitted to 4 protocols: 1) ischemic preconditioning in the upper limbs / IPC-UL; 2) ischemic preconditioning in the lower limbs / IPC-LL; 3) ischemic preconditioning in the upper and lower limbs / IPC-UL/LL; and 4) control / IPC-CONT. There was no significant difference between the different IPC protocols on the swimming speed of athletes in a 100-meter event (P > 0.05). However, in analyzing the absolute values of each swimmer, it was noted that the IPC-UL and IPC-LL protocols were more effective in reducing the race time in 66% and 83% of the sample, respectively, when compared to the control protocol. It was concluded that there was no improvement in physical performance from a statistical point of view; however, from an individual point of view, the IPC-UL and IPC-LL protocols showed a reduction in the 100-meter race time in relation to the IPC-CONT, constituting a promising result in supporting the ergogenic effect of IPC in freestyle swimmers.