The Impact of Frailty on the Survival Prognosis of Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients and the Construction and Validation of a Survival Prediction Model

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to examine the impact of frailty on the survival outcomes of patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and to develop a predictive model for mortality risk. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 400 MHD patients from Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang in March 2023 were enrolled.Patient data were collected through a questionnaire survey. Frailty status was determined according to the Fried phenotype frailty score, with patients categorized into the frailty group (≥3 points) and the non-frailty group (<3 points). Depression was assessed using the PHQ-9 scale, and anxiety was evaluated using the GAD-7 scale. Patients were randomly assigned to a training set (n = 280) and a validation set (n = 120) in a 7:3 ratio using R software. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated for frail and non-frail patients, and survival differences were compared with the log-rank test. Independent predictors of mortality were identified using the LASSO-Cox proportional hazards regression model, which was further applied to construct a mortality risk prediction model. The model’s performance was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The incidence of frailty among MHD patients was 45.75%. The mortality rate in the frailty group was 30.17%, significantly higher than 11.76% in the non-frailty group. Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated a significant survival difference between groups ( P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed frailty (HR = 1.854, 95% CI: 1.025–3.355), age (HR = 1.041, 95% CI: 1.013–1.070), depression (HR = 4.906, 95% CI: 2.000–12.035), anxiety (HR = 3.486, 95% CI: 1.778–6.831), cardiovascular disease (CVD, HR = 2.063, 95% CI: 1.126–3.781), serum creatinine (Cr, HR = 1.004, 95% CI: 1.003–1.005), and total cholesterol (TC, HR = 1.503, 95% CI: 1.133–1.995) as independent risk factors for mortality (all P < 0.05). The predictive model demonstrated a C-index of 0.903. In the validation cohort, the areas under the ROC curve at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were 0.889, 0.897, and 0.941, respectively. The calibration curve showed good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes, and DCA confirmed its clinical utility. Conclusion: Frailty is highly prevalent among MHD patients and represents an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality. A nomogram incorporating seven independent predictors provides accurate mortality risk estimates at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. This tool may facilitate the early identification of high-risk patients in clinical practice.

Article activity feed