Time-dependent vehicle-UAV path optimization for urban dynamic traffic restriction and no-fly zone

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

This study formulates a time-dependent vehicle–UAV joint routing problem (TDVRPD-VRZ-NFZ) for Wuhan’s urban distribution, capturing the interaction between diurnal traffic dynamics and Vehicle-Restricted Zones (VRZs) as well as No-Fly Zones (NFZs). The objective minimizes a composite cost comprising energy expenditure (vehicle and UAV), dispatch charges, and tardiness penalties. The problem is cast as a mixed-integer program that integrates time-dependent travel, regulatory detours, and energy coupling. Specifically, (i) an intra-day speed curve is fitted from peak-period statistics and inverted to obtain arc times; (ii) tangent (VRZ) and edge-tracking (NFZ) detour models are constructed; and (iii) energy models for electric vehicles and rotary-wing UAVs are incorporated. To address large-scale instances, a hybrid solver (IHGA-VNS-SL) is developed, combining GA for diversity preservation, VNS for targeted refinement, and a simulated-annealing acceptance rule. Feasibility repair with adaptive penalties is applied, while a self-learning scheduler tunes crossover, mutation, and neighborhood probabilities. On Wuhan instances calibrated with regulatory windows and time-varying traffic, IHGA-VNS-SL yields lower total cost and faster convergence than GA and GA + VNS; under tight time windows it further reduces tardiness and energy consumption while preserving feasibility and stability. Ablation experiments indicate substantial degradation when SA or self-learning is removed; sensitivity analyses further reveal that time-varying speeds suppress delays, that VRZ/NFZ primarily reshapes timing rather than mileage or energy, and that larger tardiness weights curb violations effectively. Overall, the findings indicate a close alignment between the model and urban regulatory/energy mechanisms, and demonstrate the scalability and robustness of the proposed scheduler for air–ground cooperative distribution in megacities. Limitations include deterministic demand and environment assumptions, a single-depot setting, and simplified UAV energy/geometry. Future work will extend to multi-depot and heterogeneous fleets, incorporate stochastic and online re-optimization with real-time regulatory updates, and refine energy models.

Article activity feed