Effectiveness of a lighter versus standard initial dosing regimen of Faricimab in Patients with Pretreated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Protocol of a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Phase III Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Purpose To evaluate whether initiating faricimab without an induction (“loading”) phase (Light Touch regimen) is non-inferior to standard induction therapy in terms of visual outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with other anti-angiogenic agents. Methods This multicentre, phase III, parallel-group randomised controlled non-inferiority trial is recruiting patients with nAMD unable to maintain disease control beyond 4–12-week treatment intervals from up to 16 UK NHS retinal centres. Participants are randomised 1:1 to receive either three monthly faricimab injections (standard induction) followed by treat-and-extend or immediate treat-and-extend matching their pre-switch interval (Light Touch Regimen). The primary outcome is mean change in best-corrected visual acuity from baseline to average of Weeks 52 and 56, measured by ETDRS letter score. Secondary outcomes include anatomical measures on optical coherence tomography, treatment frequency, patient-reported outcomes, and safety endpoints. Randomisation uses minimisation by baseline visual acuity, pre-switch interval, and site. Visual acuity assessors remain masked to treatment allocation. A sample size of 230 patients provides 90% power to demonstrate non-inferiority with a pre-specified margin. Conclusions This is the first prospective randomised trial comparing interval-matched versus standard induction dosing when switching to faricimab in pretreated nAMD. Results will provide evidence-based guidance on optimal switching protocols, with potential implications on assessment of treatment burden and healthcare resource utilization. If non-inferiority is demonstrated, the light touch approach could reduce patient visits while maintaining visual outcomes. Trial Registration ISRCTN10012824