Grass root litter and soil carbon quality paradoxically control Q10 of labile and recalcitrant carbon pools in a semi-arid Inceptisol
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Aim The temperature sensitivity of labile (Q 10L ) and recalcitrant (Q 10R ) pools of soil organic carbon (SOC) decomposition is a critical for predicting soil carbon (C) fluxes under changing climatic conditions. Methods Soils under six grass covers, namely, Cenchrus ciliaris , Chrysopogon fulvus , Panicum maximum , Sehima nervosum , Heteropogon contortus , and Vetiveria zizanioides from semi-arid India were evaluated for Q 10L and Q 10R of bulk soil, macroaggregates, microaggregates, and silt + clay associated SOC. Soil fractions (from 0–20 and 21–40 cm depths) were incubated at 25, 32, and 37°C for 100 days, and cumulative C mineralization was measured. The Q 10L and Q 10R were calculated using a two-pool decay model. The quality of root litter C and SOC was assessed through FTIR spectroscopy. Results Q 10L and Q 10R of microaggregate-C was significantly higher (22–64% and 22–24%, respectively) than macroaggregate-C and silt + clay-C. Among grasses, Q 10L and Q 10R values under C.ciliaris , H.contortus , and S.nervosum were lower than other grasses, indicating their capability to store SOC under global warming scenarios. Q 10L at topsoil layer was correlated with root litter C quality and at the sub-surface soil layer, it was influenced by labile C concentration. The Q 10R was correlated with the recalcitrant C concentration and SOC quality in both soil layers, indicating that quality and availability of recalcitrant SOC had pivotal roles in governing Q 10R in restored land. Conclusions Soil C and litter C quality should be potentially incorporated into the biogeochemical models to better predict SOC dynamics in managed ecosystems in the context of global warming and land use changes.