Comparative Disaster Preparedness Competencies of Nurses and Midwives: A Meta-Analysis of Global Evidence, 2000–2025

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background The increasing frequency and severity of disasters worldwide has underscored the need for a resilient health workforce. Nurses and midwives, as frontline providers, are pivotal in disaster preparedness and response. However, comparative evidence regarding their disaster-related competencies remains fragmented. Objective This meta-analysis synthesizes global evidence from 2000–2025 to compare disaster preparedness skills between nurses and midwives, with emphasis on knowledge, attitudes, and practical capabilities. Methods A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and regional databases. Eligible studies included cross-sectional surveys, intervention trials, and mixed-methods research assessing disaster preparedness competencies among nurses and/or midwives. Data were extracted and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis in Stata 18. Subgroup analyses examined geographic region, training exposure, and professional cadre. Results Forty-nine studies (n = 18,742 participants; 12,315 nurses, 6,427 midwives) met inclusion criteria. Pooled effect sizes indicated that nurses demonstrated higher overall disaster preparedness scores (SMD = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.28–0.56) compared to midwives, particularly in triage, logistics, and interprofessional coordination. Midwives, however, exhibited greater strengths in maternal–child emergency response (SMD = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.12–0.49). Training exposure significantly moderated outcomes: both cadres with structured disaster training scored markedly higher than untrained peers (p < 0.001). Conclusion Nurses generally outperform midwives in broad disaster preparedness domains, while midwives excel in maternal–child emergency contexts. These findings highlight the need for integrated, cadre-sensitive disaster training curricula that leverage the complementary strengths of both professions. Policymakers should prioritize interprofessional disaster education to optimize workforce readiness.

Article activity feed