Recognizing but Not Responding: A Mixed Methods Study of Social Determinants of Health in the Emergency Department
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objectives Social and structural factors strongly influence health outcomes but are inconsistently addressed in emergency care. This study used a mixed methods approach to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of emergency department staff regarding social determinants of health (SDOH), and to explore barriers and enablers to their integration into clinical care. Methods We conducted a mixed methods study in a single urban emergency department in Atlantic Canada. A 23-item electronic survey was distributed to 306 clinical staff between June and August 2023. Descriptive statistics with 95% confidence intervals were used to summarize responses. A subsequent qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of staff. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed using a constant comparative method until thematic saturation was achieved. Results Seventy staff members responded to the survey (22.9% response rate). Most respondents (92.9%) reported at least moderate understanding of the term “social determinants of health” and 85.7% correctly identified the Public Health Canada definition. However, only 22.9% reported routinely considering SDOH in clinical decision-making. Fewer than one in four respondents routinely inquired about social support or ability to afford medications. Most staff (92.9%) reported difficulty accessing information on community resources. Qualitative interviews revealed strong support for addressing SDOH in principle, but described time pressures, staffing shortages, and unclear referral pathways as key barriers. Conclusions Emergency department staff are aware of the impact of SDOH and support their integration into care, but consistent implementation is limited by practical and structural constraints. Enhancing access to resources, developing standardized screening tools, and strengthening social work support may help bridge the gap between awareness and action.