Nursing Documentation in the AI Era: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficiency, Mistakes, Stress, and Quality of Care

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Nursing documentation underpins patient safety and care continuity but consumes up to 40% of nurses’ working time¹. Traditional charting methods—paper notes or electronic typing—are prone to omissions, errors, and time burden², contributing to stress and reducing bedside presence³. Artificial intelligence (AI)–assisted systems, including voice-to-text, natural language processing (NLP), and predictive charting, are designed to enhance efficiency, reduce errors, and ease stress⁴⁻⁶. Yet, evidence on their comparative effectiveness versus traditional documentation remains fragmented. Objectives: To systematically review and meta-analyze the impact of AI-assisted documentation compared with traditional charting on efficiency, accuracy, mistakes, stress differential, and quality of care. Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines for quantitative synthesis⁷ and ENTREQ for qualitative evidence reporting⁸, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science (2010–2025). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, observational, and mixed-methods designs. Quantitative outcomes were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis; qualitative data (e.g., stress perceptions, usability) were synthesized thematically. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I; qualitative studies with CASP. Certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE (quantitative) and GRADE-CERQual (qualitative). Results: From 4,986 records, 32 studies (n ≈ 6,200 nurses) were included. AI-assisted documentation reduced documentation time by − 32 minutes per shift (95% CI − 40 to − 24)⁹. Accuracy and completeness improved (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.10–1.34)¹⁰. Errors decreased for omissions but increased for transcription/autocorrect mistakes¹¹. Stress differentials favored AI (SMD − 0.38; 95% CI − 0.55 to − 0.21)¹², though qualitative findings revealed concerns about deskilling and trust. Quality of care improved via more patients seen per shift and increased bedside time, though patient acceptance of AI-mediated records varied. Conclusions: AI-assisted documentation enhances efficiency, accuracy, and stress reduction, with potential to improve quality of care. However, risks of new error types and nurse concerns necessitate safeguards. A SMART roadmap recommends integrating AI literacy into curricula by 2027, mandatory verification safeguards by 2028, and stress audits in all AI deployments by 2030.

Article activity feed