Public vs. Private Emergency Medical Services and COVID-19 Mortality Outcomes in Texas: A Spatial Panel Analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Although Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are integral components of pre-hospital care, their operational role in relation to COVID-19 mortality rates remains underexplored. In the U.S., EMS agencies vary widely in ownership, with both government and private for-profit providers operating under relatively low regulatory barriers. These differences may influence population health outcomes, particularly during public health crises. This study examines the effect of public and private for-profit EMS providers on COVID-19 mortality in Texas. Utilizing data from the Texas EMS roster and COVID-19 records supplied by the Texas Department of State Health Services from March 2020 to February 2023, we calculate the proportion of EMS vehicles operated by government and for-profit providers and assess their association with COVID-19 mortality rates. Spatial Durbin Error Panel regression models reveal that having over 50% of government EMS vehicles in the county was associated with lower COVID-19 mortality rates in three of the six panels. In contrast, for-profit EMS showed limited and inconsistent associations with reduced mortality; statistically significant effects were only observed when their proportion was lower. These findings suggest that a greater presence of government EMS vehicles, compared to for-profit vehicles, may contribute to improved public health outcomes in terms of COVID-19 mortality.

Article activity feed