The Role of Metacognition and Psychological Distress in Fibromyalgia Impact: a cross-sectional study in a Turkish clinical sample

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: We examined whether metacognitive processes are associated with fibromyalgia impact and compared metacognitions between patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and matched healthy controls. We hypothesized that MCQ-30 scores would be higher in FMS and would predict FIQR total. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 56 female FMS patients and 69 age-/education-matched women completed the Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR). Group differences used t -tests or Mann–Whitney U tests; correlations used Pearson/Spearman with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR adjustment; simple linear regression tested MCQ-30 total → FIQR total. Assumptions and robustness (Huber M-regression) were examined. Results: Compared with controls, the FMS group showed higher MCQ-30 Cognitive Confidence, Uncontrollability/Danger, Cognitive Self-Consciousness, Need to Control Thoughts, MCQ-30 total, and all FIQR indices (all p<.001; d=0.66–2.60). In patients, FIQR total correlated with MCQ-30 total (r=.40, q<.01) and with Cognitive Confidence and Cognitive Self-Consciousness (q<.01). MCQ-30 total predicted FIQR total (B=0.417, SE=0.173, β=.31, R²=.10, p=.020; 95% CI for B=0.078–0.756). In robustness checks, the association remained significant (Huber M-regression B≈0.40, p<.05). Exploratory subgroup analyses using established BDI/BAI cut-offs indicated lower MCQ-30 and lower FIQR scores in patients with moderate-to-severe depression/anxiety versus those below cut-offs (all q≤.01) a counterintuitive pattern discussed within a cultural somatization/measurement-domain framework. Conclusions: Metacognitive dysfunctions are elevated in FMS and show a modest yet independent association with disease impact, supporting metacognition-focused psychosomatic interventions. The paradoxical subgroup pattern warrants cross-cultural, prespecified moderator analyses in longitudinal designs.

Article activity feed