Bidirectional causal links between psychiatric disorders and orthopaedic diseases: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background Psychiatric disorders and orthopaedic diseases frequently co-occur, but whether these associations are causal remains uncertain. We evaluated the bidirectional causal relationships between seven psychiatric disorders-major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), and anorexia nervosa (AN)-and four orthopaedic outcomes: osteoporosis, fractures, osteoarthritis, and osteomyelitis. Methods We performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) using summary-level genome-wide association study (GWAS) data; psychiatric traits were sourced from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium and orthopaedic outcomes from the IEU Open GWAS resource. Causal effects were estimated primarily with inverse-variance weighted (IVW) models, complemented by MR-Egger and weighted median analyses. Standard sensitivity analyses were conducted to probe heterogeneity, pleiotropy, and robustness. Results Genetically proxied MDD was associated with higher risks of osteoarthritis (IVW OR = 1.010, 95% CI 1.006-1.014, P < 0.001) and osteomyelitis (OR = 1.457, 95% CI 1.258–1.687, P = 0.001). ASD showed a positive association with fractures (OR = 1.042, 95% CI 1.002-1.082, P = 0.039), whereas AN was inversely associated with fractures (OR = 0.960, 95% CI 0.928-0.993, P = 0.018). Reverse MR analyses did not identify significant causal effects of orthopaedic diseases on psychiatric disorders. Sensitivity analyses did not materially change these estimates. Conclusions These findings support a causal link between genetic liability to MDD and increased risks of osteoarthritis and osteomyelitis, and suggest potential associations between ASD/AN and fracture risk. Given multiple comparisons and possible residual biases, signals should be interpreted cautiously and validated in larger, multi-ancestry cohorts.