Non-Invasive Molecular Testing for Osimertinib Acquired Resistance in T790M Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: Data concerning the acquired resistance mechanisms to osimertinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR ) T790M -positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are limited, pwithin the Asian population. This study utilized Non-invasive Molecular Testing (NIMT) to characterize these resistance mechanisms and evaluate their clinical impact. Methods Advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M positivity, treated with osimertinib after failure on first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs at Ramathibodi Hospital (January 2016–December 2019), were prospectively enrolled. Plasma samples, collected at baseline and disease progression, were analyzed via Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Clinical outcomes were subsequently correlated with the molecular findings. Results Fifty patients were included in the analysis. A significant proportion (38%, n = 19) of patients exhibited more than one resistance mechanism. The most common resistance mechanism observed was T790M -loss (50%), followed by PIK3CA alteration (14%), EGFR C797S (10%), and MET alteration (6%). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.4 months, and the time to treatment failure (TTF) for osimertinib was 9.3 months. Patients experiencing T790M -loss trended toward a shorter TTF compared to those with T790M maintenance (6.0 vs 10.1 months, P = 0.21). Patients with T790M-maintained status combined with C797S exhibited shorter OS compared to those with T790M -maintained status without C797S (11.0 vs 15.2 months). Furthermore, patients with T790M -loss accompanied by other co-alterations demonstrated a shorter TTF than those with T790M -loss alone (4.1 vs 10.6 months, P = 0.07). A significant correlation was found between T790M -loss and the presence of clinical brain metastasis prior to osimertinib use (P = 0.04). Additionally, the development of brain progression after osimertinib was significantly correlated with the presence of a BRAF mutation (P = 0.01). Conclusion Acquired resistance to osimertinib is diverse. The presence of T790M -loss suggests a poorer TTF, and OS is compromised in patients developing EGFR C797S or T790M -loss with co-mutations. Molecular profiling at progression is crucial for guiding subsequent therapy.

Article activity feed