Clinical Outcomes of Third-Generation Cephalosporins, Carbapenems, and Piperacillin-Tazobactam in the Treatment of AmpC- Associated Enterobacterales Species Sepsis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background AmpC-producing Enterobacterales are associated with resistance to many β-lactam antibiotics, and the optimal treatment approach remains challenging. The primary aim is to describe real-world outcomes of hospitalised patients with AmpC-associated Enterobacterales infections treated with different antibiotics. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study, including hospitalised patients with confirmed infections based on clinical evaluation and laboratory confirmation caused by AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. Patients received definitive therapy using 3GCss, piperacillin-tazobactam, or carbapenems, based on final culture results showing full susceptibility to the administered antibiotics. Results Patients were categorised into 3GCs, piperacillin-tazobactam, and carbapenem treatment groups. Significant baseline differences were observed; the carbapenem group included patients with higher rates of shock (32.4%) and mechanical ventilation (26.5%), compared to lower rates in the 3GCs group (shock 7%, mechanical ventilation 17%). After adjustment for potential confounders, Clinical failure rates were 17% for the 3GCs group, 32% for the piperacillin-tazobactam group, and 41% for the carbapenem group. The 28-day mortality (7%) and overall mortality (12%) were lowest in the 3GC group, followed by the piperacillin-tazobactam group (14.7% 28-day mortality). Conclusion In this real-world cohort, mortality and clinical failure appeared lower among patients with AmpC-associated Enterobacterales infections who received third-generation cephalosporins or piperacillin-tazobactam compared with carbapenems. These findings suggest that third-generation cephalosporins and piperacillin-tazobactam might be reasonable options in selected, less critically ill patients, but larger prospective studies are needed to better define their role, as these results are exploratory.

Article activity feed