Refractive Outcomes of Toric and Non-Toric IOLs in Post-Radial Keratotomy Eyes: A Comparative Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose To compare refractive outcomes in post-radial keratotomy (RK) eyes undergoing cataract surgery with toric versus non-toric intraocular lenses (IOLs), using clinical and vector-based astigmatism analysis. Methods Consecutive post-RK eyes undergoing uneventful phacoemulsification were included. Toric IOLs were offered to eyes with clear corneas and repeatable keratometry; acceptance was based on patient preference and affordability. The Barrett True-K Toric calculator was used. All surgeries were performed with digital marking and low-pressure phaco settings. Intraoperative wound leaks were noted and sutured if required . Results Of 24 eyes included, 10 received toric IOLs and 14 non-toric. The non-toric group had significantly longer axial lengths (30.01±3.5mm vs. 26.31±2.4 mm, p=0.02) and worse baseline BCVA (0.83 ± 0.5 vs. 0.41 ± 0.5 logMAR, p=0.01). At 1 month, cylindrical neutrality was achieved in 70% of toric eyes versus 20% of non-toric eyes (p < 0.001). Among eyes with residual cylinder, the mean was –0.35 ± 0.6D in the toric group versus –1.43 ± 1.3 D in the non-toric group (p=0.03). Vector analysis corroborated superior astigmatic correction in the toric group. Wound leaks occurred in 11 eyes (46%) overall, predominantly in 16-cut RK eyes and those with longer axial lengths. Conclusion Toric IOLs significantly improve refractive outcomes in post-RK eyes. While wound leaks remain a major surgical concern, particularly in 16-cut RK eyes, careful planning, appropriate IOL selection, and intraoperative vigilance can lead to safe surgery and excellent visual outcomes.

Article activity feed