T-cell responses to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Omicron in unvaccinated hospitalised adults living with and without HIV in South Africa

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

HIV-associated immune dysfunction may impact SARS-CoV-2–specific T-cell responses, yet data in COVID-19–unvaccinated people living with HIV (PLWH) remain limited. We evaluated virus-specific T-cell responses one month after COVID-19–related hospitalisation in antiretroviral-treated PLWH and HIV-uninfected adults recovering from ancestral (Wuhan-Hu-1), Beta (B.1.351), or Delta (B.1.617.2) variant infection. Flow cytometry assessed the magnitude, polyfunctionality, and activation (HLA-DR, CD38, and CD26) of CD4 + , CD8 + , and CD4 + CD8 + (double positive, DP) T-cell subsets, as well as cross-reactivity to Omicron (BA.4/BA.5). Seventeen PLWH and 21 HIV-uninfected black African adults were enrolled. SARS-CoV-2–specific CD4 + , CD8 + , and DP T-cell response magnitudes, responder frequencies, and cytokine production profiles (IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α) were comparable between groups. Spike- and nucleocapsid-specific responses correlated strongly in PLWH (CD4 + : r = 0.914, p < 0.001; CD8 + : r = 0.789; p < 0.001), whereas correlations were weaker in HIV-uninfected participants (CD4 + : r = 0.512, p < 0.05; CD8 + : r = 0.427; p = 0.069). CD26 expression and most activation phenotypes (HLA-DR/CD38 subsets) did not differ by HIV status, though PLWH had fewer CD8 + HLA-DR + CD38 - T cells (adjusted p = 0.013). Both groups demonstrated cross-recognition of Omicron, irrespective of the infecting SARS-CoV-2 variant. Our results demonstrate comparable SARS-CoV-2–specific T-cell responses and activation profiles between PLWH on antiretroviral therapy and HIV-uninfected adults, with preserved cross-reactive T-cell responses to Omicron.

Article activity feed