No differences in neural responses or performance during a cannabis cue-specific Stop-Signal Task between CUDIT-R-score-stratified cannabis users and non-users: Insights from fNIRS

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Rationale: Cannabis use continues to increase globally, with a growing proportion of users meeting criteria for cannabis use disorder (CUD). Although neural differences in reward and inhibitory control systems are commonly reported in cannabis users compared to non-users, findings using behavioural tasks are inconsistent. This is possibly due to lack of differentiation between regular and more problematic users. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate whether inhibitory control performance and associated prefrontal and orbitofrontal activation differed between cannabis users stratified by CUDIT-R score and non-user controls. Methods: Participants (N = 81) were divided into three groups based on CUDIT-R scores; 30 high-CUD-risk (≥12) and 21 low-CUD-risk (<8) cannabis users, and 30 non-user controls. All completed a cannabis-cue specific Stop-Signal Task (SST) while functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure oxygenated (oxyHb) and deoxygenated haemoglobin (deoxyHb) concentrations in the prefrontal cortices. Behavioural performance and neural activation were compared across groups. Results: No significant behavioural or neural differences were found between the groups. Conclusions: The study found no evidence of impaired inhibitory control or differential prefrontal activation in cannabis users stratified by CUDIT-R scores. The results suggest incorporating further diagnostic stratification, multimodal imaging, and ecologically valid methods in future research to better characterise cannabis-related neural adaptations and inform clinical practice.

Article activity feed