A Bladder Matter: Redefining the Grading System for Pediatric Hemorrhagic Cystitis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric hemorrhagic cystitis (HC) is a morbid, understudied condition ranging from microscopic hematuria to life-threatening hemorrhage. Existing grading systems, based on adult populations, fail to account for pediatric-specific factors and lack predictive value. This study aimed to identify risk factors for severe HC and propose a modernized, predictive grading scale. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients ≤ 18 years with gross hematuria due to HC at our institution (2014–2024). Bladder toxic exposures, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed. Existing grading systems were applied to assess utility. Chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and logistic regression identified predictors of surgical intervention (p < 0.05). Results: Ninety-three patients were included. The strongest predictors of surgical intervention were male sex ( p  = 0.023), history of bone marrow transplantation (BMT) ( p  = 0.031), busulfan exposure ( p  = 0.011), graft versus host disease (GVHD) ( p  = 0.027), BK virus ( p  = 0.01), AML ( p  = 0.043), and clot volume of >/= 10% of estimated bladder capacity (OR 34.8, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: We propose an updated grading system incorporating ultrasound findings to guide management. This revised scale improves risk stratification, guides timely urologic consultation, and standardizes clinical decision-making. Prospective validation is warranted.

Article activity feed