Lived Experiences and Influencing Factors in Type 2 Diabetes Management Among Nepali Speaking Bhutanese Americans

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Type 2 diabetes is a significant health concern among Nepali-speaking Bhutanese (NSB) individuals, a resettled refugee population in the U.S. However, limited research exists on the challenges and experiences of this group in managing their diabetes, particularly within a cultural context. Objective This study aims to understand the lived experiences of NSB patients self-managing type 2 diabetes and identify the barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for healthcare providers and community organizations. Methods This qualitative phenomenological study used semi-structured, in-person interviews with six NSB adults with type 2 diabetes in the Greater Harrisburg area of Pennsylvania (August–November 2024). A native Nepali-speaking researcher conducted the interviews to understand their lived experience self-managing their type 2 diabetes. Audio recordings were transcribed, translated, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis in MAXQDA 24, with intercoder reliability of (κ = 0.76). Results Six Nepali-speaking Bhutanese adults (four females, two males; ages 45–75+) participated in this qualitative study. Most had no formal education (n=5), limited literacy, and minimal English proficiency. Five were unemployed and covered by Medicaid; one was employed with employer-based insurance. Participants had lived with type 2 diabetes for two to fifteen years. Five themes emerged: (1) participants described an emotional trajectory from fear and misinformation at diagnosis to gradual acceptance and self-efficacy; (2) multiple barriers—language, transportation, physical limitations, and competing responsibilities—hindered self-management, though culturally familiar practices and personal motivation facilitated adaptation; (3) trust in healthcare providers was fostered through education and nurse outreach but undermined by communication gaps, cultural disconnects, and inconsistent follow-up; (4) participants recommended culturally and linguistically tailored resources, simplified interpretation services, and user-friendly diabetes technologies; and (5) community organizations and religious/cultural spaces were identified as critical venues for outreach, education, and navigation support. Conclusion Despite significant barriers, NSB individuals demonstrate a strong commitment to diabetes self-management. Culturally and linguistically responsive care is essential to reduce disparities and improve outcomes in this underserved group.

Article activity feed