Development and Implementation of a Novel Composite Immune Score to Predict 5-Year Mortality in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients: A Multi-Center, Retrospective Analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Systemic inflammation has been implicated in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) progression and prognosis. This study evaluated whether a composite Immune Score (IS), derived from complete blood count (CBC) biomarkers, could more accurately predict 5-year survival in STS patients compared to individual biomarkers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 275 patients with STS treated between 2012 and 2023 at two institutions. CBCs were collected pre-treatment (Period 1) and >4 weeks post-treatment (Period 2) . Patients were stratified by disease stage: primary (Instance 1) or advanced (Instance 2+). IS was calculated by assigning quartile-based scores (1–4) to eight inflammatory biomarkers , including white blood cell (WBC) count, red blood cell distribution width (RDW), absolute neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts, as well as neutrophil-, monocyte-, and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios . Following IS stratification, survival and the predictive utility of the IS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, respectively. Results: Mean IS values were significantly higher in deceased patients than survivors at all examined time points, except during post-treatment surveillance in advanced disease (Instance 2+, Period 2) (p < 0.05). Survival declined stepwise with increasing IS. The IS showed its strongest prognostic value for 5-year survival (AUC = 0.75; cutoff = 2.68) during post-treatment surveillance of primary disease (Instance 1, Period 2), outperforming individual biomarkers. Conclusion: A higher IS, reflecting greater systemic inflammation, was associated with worse long-term survival. The IS demonstrated the strongest predictive value during post-treatment surveillance, supporting its potential utility for risk stratification and guiding follow-up care in STS patients. Level of Evidence: III

Article activity feed