Split Renal Function Estimation Using [18F]F-Flotufolastat PET/CT: Comparison with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [99mTc]Tc-MAG3 Scintigraphy

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Physiological prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in renal proximal tubules results in radiopharmaceutical uptake in PSMA-PET, suggesting the potential to assess renal function. Thus, we evaluated whether PSMA-PET/CT allowed estimation of split renal function (SRF), potentially replacing [ 99m Tc]Tc-MAG3 scintigraphy. We retrospectively analyzed 302 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer undergoing PSMA-PET/CT using either [ 18 F]F-flotufolastat ([ 18 F]F-rhPSMA-7.3) (n=221) or [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (n=81), along with [ 99m Tc]Tc-MAG3 scintigraphy, prior to PSMA radioligand therapy. SRF was calculated from PSMA-PET/CT using mean standardized uptake values and CT-derived renal volumes. SRF was calculated from [ 99m Tc]Tc-MAG3 using standard integral analysis. Correlations between PET-derived SRF (PET-SRF) and [ 99m Tc]Tc-MAG3 -derived SRF ([ 99m Tc]Tc-MAG3-SRF) were assessed using Pearson correlation and Bland–Altman analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were conducted to evaluate diagnostic performance in detecting impaired renal function (SRF ≤ 25% and ≤40%). A PET-based accumulation index (ACI) was explored for correlation with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Results: Strong correlations were found between PET-SRF and [ 99m Tc]Tc-MAG3-SRF (r=0.88 for [ 18 F]F-flotufolastat, r=0.85 for [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11; both p<0.0001). Bland–Altman analysis showed a smaller mean bias and narrower limits of agreement for [ 18 F]F-flotufolastat (-0.56%; -11.88% to +10.75%) compared with [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (-1.18%; -15.3% to +12.95%), with 92% versus 83% of values within ± 10%, respectively. ROC analysis confirmed excellent accuracy for identifying [ 99m Tc]Tc-MAG3-SRF ≤ 25% (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.997 for [ 18 F]F-flotufolastat; AUC = 0.942 for [ 68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11). ACI and eGFR were not significantly correlated (Spearman’s ρ=0.048; p=0.49]). Conclusion: PSMA-PET/CT provides reliable estimates of SRF, with [ 18 F]F-flotufolastat showing slightly superior agreement with [ 99m Tc]Tc-MAG3 scintigraphy. This may potentially eliminate the need for additional renal scintigraphy for SRF assessment in the future and may simplify workflows and reduce patient burden.

Article activity feed