Dynamic Versus Rigid Lumbar Fixation: A Multimodal Comparison of Paraspinal Muscle Morphology, Electromyography, and Functional Outcomes

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Study Design: This cross-sectional study compared the structural, functional, and neuromuscular outcomes of dynamic versus rigid lumbar fixation. A multimodal framework integrating radiological, morphological, electrophysiological, and patient-reported measures was employed. Objectives The primary aim was to determine whether dynamic stabilization systems better preserve paraspinal muscle integrity and neuromuscular function than rigid constructs, while also reducing adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and disability. Methods Seventy-five participants were allocated to three groups: dynamic rod group (DRG, n = 25), rigid rod group (RRG, n = 25), and healthy controls (CG, n = 25). Paraspinal muscle volumes were assessed via MRI, and ASD was graded using Pfirrmann and Weishaupt classifications. Functional outcomes included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), McGill torso endurance tests, and surface electromyography (sEMG) normalized to maximum voluntary contraction. Results The DRG demonstrated significantly greater multifidus and erector spinae volumes (p < 0.001, d ≈ 1.0), superior core endurance across all McGill tests (p < 0.001, η²=0.495–0.842), and lower ODI scores (p = 0.027, d = 0.64) compared to RRG. sEMG showed higher normalized contraction activity in DRG (p < 0.001, d = 1.10) and elevated resting activity in RRG (p = 0.012, d = 0.73). Radiological findings revealed more severe disc degeneration in RRG (p = 0.018). Time since surgery correlated with progressive degeneration and muscle atrophy, more pronounced in RRG (e.g., r=–0.63, p < 0.001). Conclusions Dynamic lumbar fixation preserves paraspinal muscle morphology, enhances neuromuscular activation, and slows degenerative progression compared with rigid systems. These findings underscore the clinical importance of motion-preserving implants and highlight the role of early rehabilitation in optimizing postoperative recovery and long-term functional outcomes.

Article activity feed