Unveiling Disparities in WHO Grade II Glioma Care Among Physicians in Middle East and North African (MENA) Countries: A Multidisciplinary Survey

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background : Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) need multi-disciplinary treatment from different specialties, directed by new molecular classifications and prognostic markers. Yet regional practice patterns and obstacles are not reported, especially in MENA countries. Method : A cross-sectional survey of physicians from MENA countries (including: neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists) was conducted by an electronic survey. The feedback included responses regarding surgical interventions, adjuvant treatment preferences, and barriers to adoption of IDH-mutant inhibitors. Results : 137 physicians (37.23% neurosurgery, 32.85% radiation oncology, 29.93% medical oncology). Most had 6–15 years of experience (56.21%) and worked in government hospitals (51.82%). Maximal safe resection (MSR), if applicable, was preferred over biopsy (89.05%). For residual Astrocytoma, concurrent radiotherapy (RT) with temozolomide (TMZ) (42.34%) was most preferred adjuvant, while 44.53% prefer observation after gross total resection (GTR). For residual Oligodendroglioma, RT followed by PCV (45.99%) was preferred, with 59.85% offered observation post- GTR. Most (96.35%) agreed that resection extent impacts outcomes, while 72.99% objected to extending TMZ beyond six cycles. High-risk stratification varied: 46.72% used age ≥40 years, and 88.32% prioritized residual tumor volume. Although 64.96% supported IDH-mutant inhibitors, 58.39% cited limited availability, cost (40.88%), and insufficient long-term data (31.39%) as a barriers. Specialty-specific differences emerged: radiation oncologists trend more to provide adjuvant radiotherapy with persistent seizure post-operatively, and medical/radiation oncologists more often used age ≥40 for high-risk stratification. Conclusion : There is a wide variation LGG management among MENA physicians. These data highlight the importance of locally derived guidelines, and collaboration between multiple disciplines to ensure optimal patient outcomes.

Article activity feed