Evaluation of Deep Learning Model Performance for Water Quality Classification: Comparison of CNN, LSTM, and Hybrid CNN-LSTM

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Water quality monitoring is crucial for protecting public health and ensuring environmental sustainability. This study uses a high-frequency time-series dataset from Brisbane, Australia, to classify water quality as either 'Suitable' or 'Unsuitable' using three deep learning models: CNN, LSTM, and a hybrid CNN-LSTM. To counter the dataset's significant class imbalance, a class weighting strategy was used during training. The models were evaluated using metrics like accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The hybrid CNN-LSTM model outperformed the others, achieving superior and more balanced results with an accuracy of 97.1%, a precision of 97.1%, a recall of 97.0%, and an F1-score of 97.0%. These results demonstrate the hybrid model's enhanced ability to handle complex temporal data and extract relevant features, making it a promising solution for robust, real-time water quality warning systems for water quality management.

Article activity feed