Quantitative Evaluation of Thoracic Skeletal Muscle Mass and Normal/Fibrotic Lung Volumes on CT in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients: Prognostic Significance

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significance and impact on mortality of sarcopenia—assessed through thoracic skeletal muscles—and threshold-based quantitative lung volumetric analysis in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent non-contrast thoracic CT between January 2019 and August 2023 at Ankara Bilkent City Hospital and exhibited a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern in the lung parenchyma were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 106 IPF patients meeting the inclusion criteria and 106 age- and sex-matched control subjects without any chronic lung disease were included in the study. To assess sarcopenia, the cross-sectional area (PMA) and density (PMD) of the pectoralis muscles were measured from the first axial slice above the aortic arch, while the cross-sectional area (ESA) and density (ESD) of the erector spinae muscles were measured from a single axial slice at the lower margin of the 12th thoracic vertebra. Using an artificial intelligence-based analysis software package (Thoracic VCAR, GE Healthcare), normal and fibrotic lung volumes were quantitatively measured. All CT measurements were compared between the patient and control groups. Results: The mean body mass index (BMI) of the patient group was significantly lower than that of the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, quantitative lung volume measurements (Normal Attenuation Lung Volume - NALV [L and %], Low Attenuation Lung Volume - LALV [%], High Attenuation Lung Volume - HALV [L and %], total lung volume) and thoracic skeletal muscle measurements (ESA, ESI, PMA, PMI) were significantly lower in the patient group (p < 0.05). Patients were grouped as sarcopenic or non-sarcopenic based on the distribution of their Erector Spinae Index (ESI) and Pectoralis Muscle Index (PMI). According to ESI, sarcopenic patients had significantly lower two-year survival rates, follow-up durations, normal attenuation lung volume (NALV in L and %), total lung volume, FVC (L), and FEV1 (L) compared to non-sarcopenic patients (p < 0.05). However, when classified by PMI, no statistically significant differences were observed between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic groups in terms of two-year survival rates or quantitative lung volumes (p > 0.05). Conclusion: ESI and NAAV (%) obtained through quantitative CT analysis are significant prognostic indicators for predicting two-year mortality in IPF patients.

Article activity feed