Assessment of AST to platelet ratio index (APRI) and albumin-bilirubin score (ALBI) in patients with colorectal cancer: A stage-wise analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy globally and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Liver dysfunction and metastasis remain major contributors to poor outcomes. Noninvasive biomarkers such as the Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) and the Albumin-Bilirubin (ALBI) score have shown potential in assessing liver function and predicting prognosis, but their stage-wise relevance in CRC is not well established. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 212 CRC patients aged ≥ 40 years admitted to Rasoul-e-Akram and Sina hospitals between 2015 and 2025. Patients were categorized into primary (stages 1 and 2) and advanced (stages 3 and 4) groups. APRI and ALBI scores were calculated from blood parameters and compared across stages using one-way ANOVA, chi-square, and Fisher’s exact tests. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed, with p -value < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Of the included patients, 57% had primary-stage CRC and 43% advanced-stage CRC. Both APRI and ALBI scores increased significantly with advancing cancer stage. Compared with primary stages, APRI showed an OR of 3.725 (95% CI: 1.723–7.783) and ALBI an OR of 1.926 (95% CI: 1.006–3.591) for advanced disease. Stage-wise analysis revealed that APRI ( p -value = 0.0128) and ALBI ( p -value = 0.03) were significantly higher in stage 4 compared to stage 3, with similar differences observed against earlier stages. Conclusion: APRI and ALBI scores increase with CRC progression, with the most pronounced elevations in stage 4. These indices offer simple, noninvasive, and cost-effective tools for assessing disease severity and guiding clinical decision-making. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to validate their prognostic utility and to establish standardized cut-off values.

Article activity feed