Transnational Caregiving: Emotional, Financial, and Technological Roles of Nigerian Immigrants in Northern British Columbia

Background/Rationale Migration can alter caregiving practices, redistributing responsibilities across geographically dispersed networks. However, systemic barriers such as economic precarity, limited digital access, and immigration constraints often exacerbate the complexities of caregiving in transnational contexts. In addition to the common challenges faced by caregivers, such as emotional strain, logistical coordination, and financial demands, transnational caregivers must also navigate the complexities introduced by physical distance from their care recipients. Technology has emerged as a critical tool in bridging these gaps, enabling caregivers to provide emotional support, monitor health, and manage caregiving tasks remotely. This study examines how Nigerian immigrants navigate transnational care, focusing on the interplay between technology, economic, and emotional dynamics, and offers insights into the evolving nature of caregiving in a globalized world. Methodology and Methods This qualitative study examined the caregiving experiences of Nigerian immigrants in Northern British Columbia (BC), employing the integrated frameworks of transnationalism and intersectionality. An inductive thematic analysis was employed, with a focus on the emotional, economic, and technological dimensions of caregiving and the influence of migration on caregiving roles. Data collection included pre-interview surveys to capture demographic and caregiving contexts, and narrative interviews that provided in-depth accounts of participants’ caregiving experiences across borders. These methods offered a nuanced exploration of the complexities of transnational caregiving. Results This study identified key themes shaping transnational caregiving among Nigerian immigrants. Caregivers expressed guilt, helplessness, and emotional strain, but also resilience through familial support and self-care. Migration redistributed caregiving roles, with local families providing physical care and migrants offering financial support and coordination. Tools like WhatsApp and video calls enabled emotional connection and remote monitoring despite digital limitations. Financial remittances sustained care but introduced economic strain. Family bonds were maintained through virtual collaboration, with caregivers navigating cultural and gendered tensions. Conclusions This study reveals the adaptability of Nigerian transnational caregivers as they navigate financial, emotional, and logistical responsibilities across borders. While emphasizing resilience, the findings also highlight systemic challenges-including digital inequities and economic pressures-calling on policymakers, healthcare providers, and community organizations to develop culturally informed policies and targeted support that empower caregivers and enhance well-being within an interconnected world.