Microvascular Decompression for Vertebrobasilar Dolichoectasia-Related Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia: Surgical Strategies, Technical Nuances, and Clinical Outcomes

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the surgical strategies, technical key points, and clinical efficacy of microvascular decompression (MVD) in treating primary trigeminal neuralgia (PTN) associated with vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia (VBD). Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 34 consecutive VBD-related PTN patients treated by a single neurosurgeon at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital between January 2020 and April 2025. VBD compression patterns were classified into two types: ​Type I: Imaging showing significant brainstem deformation and obliterated arachnoid space by VBD (n=16, 47.1%). ​Type II: Imaging confirming VBD presence without or with minimal brainstem deformation and preserved arachnoid space (n=18, 52.9%). Type-specific MVD techniques were applied: a four-step approach for Type I and a three-step approach for Type II. Outcomes were evaluated using the Barrow Neurological Institute Pain Intensity Scale (BNI) during follow-up (range: 2–64 months). Results: Among 1,214 PTN patients treated during the study period, 34 (2.8%) had VBD-related PTN. ​Preoperative BNI grades: Grade V in 8 patients (23.5%); Grade IV in 26 patients (76.5%). 17.6% (6/34) had comorbid cranial neuropathies. ​Postoperative outcomes: BNI Grade I: 91.2% (31/34),BNI Grade II: 8.9% (3/34),Overall success rate (BNI ≤ II): 100%. Conclusion: VBD-related PTN is a rare clinical entity characterized by severe refractory pain. Based on VBD compression morphology (Type I vs. Type II), tailored MVD strategies provide a safe and effective surgical approach, achieving excellent pain relief.

Article activity feed