Assessing the prognostic value of Age-adjusted EASIX for predicting mortality in critically ill surgical patients: a retrospective cohort study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose: Critically ill surgical patients face high mortality rates, necessitating early and accurate risk stratification. The Age-Adjusted Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (aEASIX), a simple biomarker for endothelial dysfunction, has shown promise in other cohorts but remains uninvestigated in a broad surgical intensive care unit (SICU) population. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the aEASIX upon SICU admission and short-term mortality in critically ill surgical patients. Patients and methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the MIMIC-IV database. We included 4,394 adult patients with a first-time admission to a SICU. Because the aEASIX distribution was markedly skewed, we applied a natural-log transformation (LnaEASIX). The primary outcome was 28-day ICU mortality, and the secondary outcome was 28-day in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic splines, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. A mediation analysis explored the role of the SOFA score. Results: The overall 28-day ICU and 28-day in-hospital mortality rates were 18.0% and 17.09%, respectively. After adjusting for confounders, a higher LnaEASIX was independently associated with an increased risk of both 28-day ICU mortality (OR 1.348, 95% CI 1.259-1.445, P < 0.001) and 28-day in-hospital mortality (OR 1.367, 95% CI 1.275-1.465, P < 0.001). A non-linear, dose-response relationship was observed for both outcomes. In predictive performance analysis, aEASIX demonstrated significantly better discrimination than the SOFA score for both 28-day ICU mortality (AUC: 0.653 vs. 0.625) and 28-day in-hospital mortality (AUC: 0.649 vs. 0.614). Mediation analysis revealed that the SOFA score mediated 17.6% and 14.7% of the total effect of LnaEASIX on 28-day ICU and 28-day in-hospital mortality, respectively. Conclusion: The aEASIX is a significant and independent predictor of short-term mortality in a large, heterogeneous cohort of critically ill surgical patients. As a simple, readily available tool, aEASIX outperforms the SOFA score in predicting both ICU and in-hospital mortality and may serve as a valuable instrument for early bedside risk stratification in the SICU.

Article activity feed