Demographic, Motivational, and Institutional Factors Impacting Academic Success in Higher Education

Read the full article

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background This study explores how various factors-including motivation, emotion, demographics, and institutional characteristics-interact to shape academic success among Greek university students. Based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Tinto’s model of integration, it fills a gap in research by addressing the specific characteristics of the Greek higher education system. While prior research emphasizes the importance of motivation and integration, few studies have combined these with factors like program alignment, student type, and gender in a structural model. Methods A sample of 284 students, aged 18-28, completed validated Greek versions of the AMS, PASS, and SACQ. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to assess both direct and indirect effects on academic success. Key variables included gender, traditional vs. non-traditional student status, first-choice program enrollment, intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, academic and social integration, emotional adjustment, institutional attachment, and procrastination. Results Gender (female) was the strongest predictor of academic success (β = .819), affecting outcomes through intrinsic motivation, emotional adjustment, and procrastination. Academic integration (β = .424) and traditional student status (β = .300) also significantly predicted GPA. Social integration had an indirect effect through academic engagement. Procrastination (β = -.228) and emotional maladjustment (β = -.143) were major obstacles. While selecting a first-choice program affected institutional attachment, it did not directly impact academic performance. Conclusion Academic success in Greek universities is influenced by a range of personal, motivational, and contextual factors. Improving integration, reducing procrastination, and fostering intrinsic motivation can boost academic outcomes. Interventions should consider gender and student pathways to be more effective.

Article activity feed