A Time-To-Event Analysis to Conceptualize and Predict Delay in Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis in Primary Care

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Delayed diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes (T2D) contributes to the development of diabetes-related health complications. Although signs of T2D are commonly identified in primary care, delays in diagnosis remain a significant challenge. The relationship between patient-level factors (e.g., demographics and healthcare utilization patterns), practice-related factors (e.g., primary care location), and the time to T2D diagnosis represents a critical, yet understudied, research area. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of 736 adults who received care from two primary care clinics within an integrated healthcare system in the mid-Atlantic region of the United States (2017--2023). Kaplan--Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models quantified diagnostic delays from the first elevated hemoglobin A1c (HgA1c \((\ge)\)5.7% [39\,mmol/mol]) to documented T2D diagnosis. Patient features, primary care location, continuity of care and visit regularity were evaluated in multivariate models as potential contributors to diagnostic delay. A Markov cohort state-transition model characterized diagnostic pathways over one year following the initial abnormal HgA1c measurement. Results: Median time to formal T2D diagnosis varied significantly between the two primary care locations (10 months vs. 6.6 months) which highlighted practice-specific gaps in timely diagnosis. High continuity and regularity of primary care visits were significantly associated with shorter time to diagnosis. Markov cohort model revealed that 60.6% of individuals remained undiagnosed one year after the initial abnormal HgA1c. Conclusion: Our study highlights the role of clinical practice influencing diagnostic delay in T2D within primary care. Improved continuity and regularity of care accelerate the T2D diagnosis, while location-specific diagnostic disparities persist. These findings underscore the urgent need for targeted clinical and policy interventions aimed at improving patient engagement, strengthening continuity of care, and facilitating earlier diagnosis.

Article activity feed