Factors associated with complication of cranioplasty: CT-Based Risk assessment for Early Failure of Autologous-Bone Cranioplasty

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Purpose To determine whether preoperative noncontrast CT features predict early revision after autologous bone cranioplasty and to develop a simple CT-based risk framework. Methods We retrospectively studied adults undergoing autologous cranioplasty at a single center (2010–2020). Preoperative CT variables and clinical indicators were evaluated as candidate predictors in the regression and machine-learning models. The primary outcome was unplanned revision surgery within 30 days. Associations were tested with multivariable logistic regression. A feature-importance derived from the random forest model was used to assess the relative contributions of risk factors. Results Among 376 patients (mean age 48.9 years; 71.0% male), 52 (13.8%) underwent revision surgery within postoperative 30 days. Encephalomalacia (EM) area was the dominant predictor (adjusted OR 4.311). A prespecified cut-off of ≥ 620 mm² yielded sensitivity 90.38% and specificity 59.88% (OR 14.03). Sinking skin flap (OR 6.17), hydrocephalus (OR 3.35), and EM involving ≥ 2 lobes (OR 4.37) were also significant. All patients (10/10) who underwent concurrent VP shunting during cranioplasty required revision surgery, resulting in a 100% failure rate for this group. A logistic regression achieved AUC 0.83 and accuracy 88.0% (specificity 97%, sensitivity 22%); random forest achieved AUC 0.85 and accuracy 88.2% (specificity 96%, sensitivity 33%). EM area ranked highest in feature importance. Conclusions Preoperative CT provides independent prognostic information for early revision after autologous cranioplasty. A simple thresholded EM-area metric can serve as a high-sensitivity screening tool for predicting early failure after cranioplasty. When EM burden is substantial, the reconstructive strategy may warrant modification.

Article activity feed