Super donor assessment tool for oral microbiome transplantation

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Aims

Oral microbiome transplantation (OMT) involves transferring microbiota from donor to recipient. However, selecting suitable donors remains challenging due to a lack of standardised guidelines. This study developed a novel super donor assessment tool (SDAT) combining a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) process and an analytical hierarchical process (AHP) to identify OMT “super donors” for dental caries prevention.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used four sequential screening phases with data from 93 healthy participants, capturing socio-demographics, lifestyle, dietary and oral health behaviours. The SDAT employed MCDM, AHP, combining criteria with normalised and weighted ranks to establish the top 10 donors for three models: “Optimal donor” (Model 1), “Ideal donor” (Model 2), and “Sub-optimal donor” (Model 3). Donor plaque samples underwent 16S ribosomal RNA amplicon sequencing for microbial profiling, examining alpha and betadiversity, differential abundance, and network analysis.

Results

Alpha diversity analysis showed significant differences among groups (Kruskal-Wallis p  < 0.001), with Model 1 showing the lowest diversity and Model 3 the highest. Beta diversity analysis using Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance revealed significant differences in microbial community composition (R² = 0.19, p  = 0.001). Differential abundance analysis (False Discovery Rate < 0.05, controlling for age and sex) identified health-associated genera ( Neisseria , Lautropia , Streptococcus , Veillonella ) in Model 1, whereas Model 3 showed higher levels of disease-associated taxa ( Treponema , Capnocytophaga ). Network analysis revealed that Model 1 was organised around Actinomyces and Prevotella , Model 2 around Rothia and Haemophilus , and Model 3 was dominated by pathogenic taxa.

Conclusion

SDAT provides a systematic, transparent framework for super-donor selection, ensuring precision and reproducibility in donor rankings. The scoring system standardises the donor selection process, the effectiveness of donor screening, and reduces the risk of adverse events for OMT.

Article activity feed