Thermal Ablation vs. Conventional Neck Dissection for Recurrent Low-Burden Lymph Node Metastasis in Thyroid Cancer: A Dual-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Objective: To compare ultrasound-guided thermal ablation (TA) with conventional neck dissection (CND) for recurrent low-burden lymph node metastasis (≤3 lesions, <2 cm) in thyroid cancer, aiming to guide precision therapy. Methods: A dual-center retrospective study (2016–2022) analyzed 230 patients with recurrent lymph node metastasis, stratified into TA ( n = 115) and reoperation groups ( n = 115). Endpoints included recurrence-free survival, complications, thyroglobulin (Tg) dynamics, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), and healthcare costs. Results: Oncological Outcomes: No significant difference in 36-month recurrence rates (Log-rank p = 0.54; Bonferroni-corrected p = 1.00). Safety: Similar complication rates (nerve injury, hypocalcemia, hematoma, infection; all p > 0.7). TA Advantages: Shorter operative time, less blood loss, faster recovery, shorter hospital stays, and lower costs. 50% of TA-treated patients achieved complete lymph node volume reduction (100% VRR) within 36 months. Conclusion: TA demonstrates non-inferior oncological efficacy to CND for strictly selected patients with recurrent low-burden lymph node metastasis, offering minimally invasive precision therapy with superior procedural efficiency and quality-of-life benefits.

Article activity feed