Real-World Cost Evaluation of Conbercept vs Ranibizumab for Retinal and Choroidal Vascular Diseases from 2021 to 2024: Evidence from Societal and Medical Insurance Perspectives

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Leading blindness causing retinal and choroidal vascular diseases including age-related macular degeneration (AMD), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic macular edema (DME), and choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia (PM) treated with Conbercept and Ranibizumab impose a heavy economic burden. The Markov model was constructed based on best-corrected visual acuity, real-world injection frequencies in Tianjin (2021–2024), costs, utility values, and transition probabilities derived from clinical trials. From both the societal and medical insurance perspectives, conbercept was more cost-effective than ranibizumab in BRVO, CRVO, DME, and PM with Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) as 442,423.176, -2,429,628.701, -69,339.384, 410,661.276 RMB/QALY under the societal perspective, and − 370,506.503, -2,491,085.315, -66,253.162, -432,736.475 RMB/QALY under the medical insurance perspective in 2023, respectively. In contrast, ranibizumab consistently showed greater effectiveness for AMD, with conbercept's ICER reaching 53,927.073 RMB/QALY in 2024 under the medical insurance perspective. These findings provide economic evidence to support value-based decision-making anti-VEGF therapy in China.

Article activity feed