Municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash in concrete : A systematic review and meta-analysis

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Bottom Ash (MSWIBA), a byproduct of waste-to-energy (WtE) facilities, has emerged as a promising candidate for use both as a sustainable aggregate replacement in concrete and as a supplementary cementitious material (SCM). This systematic review and meta-analysis, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, evaluates its mechanical, durability, and environmental impacts. A literature search (2000–2025) across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Engineering Village identified 38 studies with 312 experimental groups. Random-effects meta-analysis showed that MSWIBA replacement up to 20% results in a modest reduction in compressive strength (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] = − 0.42, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] − 0.58 to − 0.26, p  < 0.001), with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 = 78%). Tensile strength (SMD = − 0.48, 95% CI − 0.68 to − 0.28, p  < 0.001) and flexural strength (SMD = − 0.52, 95% CI − 0.74 to − 0.30, p  < 0.001) also decrease moderately. Durability outcomes, including chloride penetration (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.54) and freeze-thaw resistance (SMD = − 0.41, 95% CI − 0.72 to − 0.10), show mixed results due to limited data. MSWIBA reduces landfill use by saving 100 kg CO 2 per ton of concrete and conserves natural aggregates, but variability in composition, potential heavy metal leaching, and reduced mechanical properties at higher replacements (> 20%) pose challenges.

Article activity feed