Innovative or Inadequate? Assessing Human Resource Job Training Methods among Senior Administrative Staff in UDS

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the use and perceived effectiveness of various staff training methods among senior administrative staff at the University for Development Studies (UDS), Ghana. Purpose: To explore training method usage and staff perceptions of effectiveness. Method: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 120 purposively selected senior administrative staff. Results: Career/development training had the highest mean effectiveness rating (3.54), while distance and Internet-based training was the least rated (2.66). Conclusion: A strong preference for traditional training methods persists, indicating limited digital readiness. Recommendations: Institutions must modernise training delivery through blended models, capacity building, alignment with adult learning principles, and technology acceptance strategies.

Article activity feed