Risk Factors for Predicting the Occult Hilar-Mediastinal lymph node Metastasis in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with negative or symmetric uptake pattern on preoperative F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background: Accurate nodal staging is crucial to the management and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. N staging of NSCLC Patients with negative or symmetric uptake pattern in hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes (HMLNs) on preoperative 2- deoxy-2-[ 18 F] fluoro-D-glucose ( 18 F-FDG) PET/CT is difficult. This study aimed to explore risk factors for occult lymph node metastasis (OLNM) in NSCLC patients with negative or symmetric uptake patterns in HMLNs on preoperative 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with NSCLC who underwent pulmonary resection and regional lymph node dissection within 1 month after 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Patients with negative or symmetric uptake patterns in bilateral HMLNs and without distant metastasis on preoperative 18 F-FDG PET/CT were included. Postoperative pathology served as the gold standard for identifying OLNMs. Clinical, pathological characters, and image parameters were compared between patients with and without OLNMs. Results: A total of 91 patients (60 males; mean age 67.2± 9.0 years) were included. The median primary tumor size was 2.2cm. Post-surgery pathology identified OLNM in 12 patients (13.2%, including four in N2 stage and 8 in N1 stage). Among those, 5 (5/59) patients showed a symmetric uptake pattern, 7 (7/32) patients showed a negative uptake pattern in HMLNs. Univariate analysis revealed a significant difference in tumor size (4.0 cm vs. 2.1 cm, P=0.001), MTV (9.1 vs. 2.9, P=0.001), and TLG (81.1 vs. 15.0, P=0.001) between patients with and without OLNMs. Multivariate analysis identified primary tumor size as an independent risk factor for OLNM (OR=2.439, 95% CI: 1.311 to 4.536, P=0.005). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of primary tumor size for OLNM prediction was 0.804 (P<0.001, 95% CI: 0.684 to 0.925). Conclusions: For NSCLC patients with negative or symmetric uptake pattern in HMLNs on preoperative 18 F-FDG PET/CT, primary tumor size is an independent predictor for OLNM.

Article activity feed