Evaluation of a Novel Flexible Cage System for C5-C6 Fixation: A Finite Element Study Against Conventional ACDF Implants
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Cervical spondylosis is a common cause of spinal cord dysfunction, and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is widely employed when conservative treatment fails. Conventional implant systems such as the cervical cage with plate (CCP) and zero-profile stand-alone cage (ZPSC) are commonly used to enhance spinal stability and promote fusion, but they are associated with complications including dysphagia and adjacent segment degeneration 1–3 . To address these limitations, a novel flexible plate cage system (FPCS) has been developed to optimize biomechanical performance while minimizing surgical risk 4 . In this study, a finite element model of the C3–T1 cervical spine was constructed to simulate ACDF at the C5–C6 level using CCP, ZPSC, and FPCS implants. Under standardized loading conditions, von Mises stress was analyzed in the bone, intervertebral disc, endplates, cage, and screws, using the mean of the top 5% stress values to ensure accuracy 5,6 . All surgical models showed increased stress compared to the intact reference spine 7–9 . The ZPSC model exhibited the highest stress in the cage and screws, suggesting a more concentrated load path 10 . The CCP model showed a more evenly distributed stress profile, particularly affecting the inferior adjacent segment 11,12 . The FPCS model demonstrated moderate cage stress, reduced screw stress, and the highest plate stress, indicating a design that effectively redirects mechanical load toward the anterior plate while minimizing stress on critical bone structures 13,14 . This may be related to the FPCS’s unique structural configuration, which secures screws horizontally into the anterior vertebral body without penetrating the endplates 15 . These findings suggest that the FPCS may offer a biomechanically favorable alternative to existing ACDF implants 16,17 .