Success Outcomes for Bypass or Retrieval of Fractured Endodontic Instruments: A Systematic Review

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction : Fractured endodontic instruments complicate root canal therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of bypassing or retrieving fractured files on treatment success. Aims : To assess clinical outcomes after bypassing or retrieving fractured endodontic instruments. Design : Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies from January 2000 to August 2023. Setting : Searches were conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central, DOAJ, and other databases. Materials and Methods : Clinical studies reporting treatment outcomes following bypass or retrieval were included. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis (RevMan 5.4) reported pooled odds ratios (OR) for success. Results: Five studies were included in the qualitative synthesis; four in the meta-analysis (492 participants). The pooled OR was 20.39 [95% CI: 2.68–155.18], favoring active management. Success rates rose from 68.1% to 95%, especially when fragments were visible, canals were straight, and magnification or ultrasonics were used. Heterogeneity was high (I² = 97%). Discussion : Active management improves outcomes, though success varies with anatomy, case selection, and clinician expertise. Conclusion : Bypassing or retrieving fractured instruments increases root canal success. More robust studies are needed to guide consistent clinical protocols.

Article activity feed