Endoscopic Choledochoduodenostomy versus Gallbladder Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Propensity Score Matched Study

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GB) is an emerging alternative to choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CBD) for malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO), particularly when conventional access is not feasible. Methods : We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study of patients undergoing EUS-GB or EUS-CBD for MDBO between January 2015 and October 2024. Primary outcomes were technical and clinical success. Secondary outcomes included procedural time, 6-month reintervention, adverse events (AEs), and all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences. Results: Eighty-two patients were included (22 EUS-GB, 60 EUS-CBD). Technical success was comparable between groups (95.5% vs. 96.7%). EUS-GB was used as salvage in 50% of cases when EUS-CBD was not feasible, with a 90.9% technical success rate. PSM yielded 21 matched pairs. Clinical success was similar (95.2% EUS-GB vs. 85.7% EUS-CBD, p =0.61). EUS-CBD had significantly lower 6-month reintervention (4.8% vs. 23.8%, p =0.004) and stent-related complications (0% vs. 18.9%). Adverse event rates and all-cause mortality were similar. Median follow-up was 116 days (IQR: 51–300). In the EUS-GB group, pre-procedural cystic duct patency predicted clinical success (94.1%). Conclusion: EUS-GB is a technically effective and clinically comparable alternative to EUS-CDS for MDBO, with significantly fewer reinterventions and stent-related complications. When cystic duct patency is confirmed on imaging, EUS-GB may be considered as a primary approach or salvage strategy for biliary drainage in MDBO.

Article activity feed