Sexual Dimorphism in Canine Teeth for Forensic Sex Determination: A Population-Specific Study from Northern Ghana

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background : Sexual dimorphism in dental morphology is fundamental to forensic identification, and population-specific variations are critical for accurate sex determination. Despite its importance in medicolegal investigations, comprehensive data on dental sexual dimorphism remain limited in West African populations. Objective : This study evaluated the forensic utility of maxillary and mandibular canine dimensions for sex determination in the Northern Ghanaian population and assessed the practical limitations of this approach. Methods : A cross-sectional study examined 212 participants aged 18-25 years [93 males (43.9%), 119 females (56.1%)] from the Tamale region of Northern Ghana (May-September 2022). Mesiodistal canine widths and inter-canine distances were measured using standardized anthropometric protocols with an inter-rater reliability assessment. Statistical analysis employed descriptive statistics, binary logistic regression, and diagnostic accuracy measures, including ROC curve analysis, with significance set at p<0.05. Results : Mandibular canines demonstrated modest sexual dimorphism, with males showing significantly larger dimensions: right mandibular canine width (7.26±0.67mm vs. 6.88±0.51mm, p<0.001), left mandibular canine width (7.15±0.60mm vs. 6.87±0.39mm, p<0.001), and inter-canine distance (30.88±2.74mm vs. 29.32±1.98mm, p<0.0001). Traditional forensic canine indices showed an accuracy equivalent to chance (49.5-51.9%, 95% CI: 43.2-58.6%). Binary logistic regression achieved marginally improved performance, with the left mandibular canine index reaching a maximum accuracy of 58.0% (95% CI: 51.1-64.7%, AUC=0.618). Conclusions : Despite statistically significant sexual dimorphism in Northern Ghanaian canines, forensic utility is severely limited by accuracy rates barely exceeding chance (58% vs. 50%). The 8% improvement over random classification falls substantially below the 80-90% threshold required for reliable forensic applications. Canine-based sex determination lacks practical forensic value as a standalone method in this population

Article activity feed