Comparison of the effects of video double-lumen endotracheal tubes and conventional double-lumen endotracheal tubes on peripheral oxygen saturation during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Background Compared to the conventional double-lumen endotracheal tube (c-DLT), the video double-lumen endotracheal tube (v-DLT) demonstrates a shorter intubation time and the capability of observing and adjusting malposition at any time. Our objective was to compare the incidence of hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) and perioperative complications between the two tube types. Methods 100 patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) were randomized to receive either a v-DLT or a c-DLT. Low tidal volume ventilation was used during OLV. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia (defined as SpO 2 <90%) during OLV. To prevent its occurrence, a predefined protocol was activated if SpO 2 dropped below 95%. Sequential interventions included DLT repositioning, increasing FiO₂, adjusting ventilator settings, applying 5 cmH₂O PEEP to the ventilated lung, applying 5 cmH₂O CPAP to the operative lung, or resuming two-lung ventilation. Results The incidence of hypoxemia during OLV in the v-DLT group was significantly lower than that in the c-DLT group (6.3% vs. 27.7%, p  = 0.006). No statistically significant difference was observed in postoperative complications between two groups ( p  = 0.732). The v-DLT demonstrated greater convenience ( p <0.001), shorter intubation time ( p < 0.001), easier intubation ( p < 0.001), higher intubation success rate ( p < 0.001), lower workload ( p < 0.001), higher work efficiency ( p < 0.001), and could enhance user satisfaction among anesthesiologists ( p < 0.001). Conclusions The v-DLT can significantly reduce the incidence of hypoxemia during OLV compared with the c-DLT. Simultaneously, it reduced the workload of anesthesiologists and enhanced their overall satisfaction levels. Trial registration: Chictr.org.cn ChiCTR2100046484. Registered on 16 May 2021.

Article activity feed