Tissue Microarray Analysis Reveals Heterogeneous Expression of Talin-1 and Lactate Dehydrogenase A in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Implications for Biomarker Reliability
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Background Tumour heterogeneity significantly impacts biomarker reliability in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), complicating the validation of diagnostic proteins such as lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) and Talin-1. This study investigated their expression heterogeneity in tissue microarrays (TMAs) from 40 non-metastatic NSCLC cases (24 squamous cell carcinomas, 16 adenocarcinomas) and 10 normal controls, using standardised immunohistochemistry (IHC). Methods Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) TMAs were stained with anti-LDHA and anti-Talin-1 antibodies. Expression was scored (0–3) for intensity and analysed against tumour grade/stage. Results Normal tissues showed minimal reactivity (scores 0–1), while tumours exhibited marked heterogeneity. In adenocarcinomas, 20/32 cores (62.5%) showed moderate LDHA expression (score 2–3), predominantly in stage IIB/IIIA tumours. Talin-1 expression varied widely, with 14/32 (43.6%) adenocarcinoma cores scoring 2–3, with almost same IIIA/IIB stage ratio. Squamous cell carcinomas displayed greater inconsistency, with LDHA scores 2–3 in 34/48 cores (70.8%), and Talin-1 scored 2–3 in 12/48 (25%), the majority were in stage IIB/IIIA but no grade/stage correlation. Such findings demonstrate substantial intra- and inter-tumour heterogeneity for both biomarkers, independent of conventional clinicopathological parameters. This variability explains their inconsistent performance in prior studies and underscores the need for multiplexed biomarker panels to overcome heterogeneity-driven limitations. Conclusion Our findings reveal significant heterogeneity in LDHA and Talin-1 expression across NSCLC subtypes, independent of tumor grade/stage. This underscores the need for standardized IHC protocols and spatial profiling in biomarker development. The variability observed supports using multiplexed panels rather than single-marker approaches for reliable clinical applications.