Evaluation of a Virtual Reality-Based Eye Tracker for Neuro-Ophthalmic Assessment: A Feasibility, Reliability and Reproducibility Study

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) eye trackers provide portable and objective tools for neuro-ophthalmic testing. This study assessed the feasibility, reproducibility, and clinical utility of a VR-based eye tracker (BulbiCAM) compared to wearable eye-tracking glasses (PupilLabs Neon). Thirty-nine healthy participants underwent BulbiCAM testing across two visits, with inter-visit reproducibility evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients. Pupillary light reflex assessments were conducted with both devices, allowing paired comparisons. Participant feedback (n=27) demonstrated high acceptability, with 89% reporting the test as comfortable and 81.5% experiencing no eye strain or fatigue. BulbiCAM showed high reproducibility for pupil and pursuit tests (ICC=0.76–0.88), though saccade reproducibility was lower (best ICC=0.62). Key pupillometric parameters showed strong agreement between devices, with minimal bias observed in baseline diameter (-0.48 mm), peak constriction (-0.56 mm), constriction velocity (0.22 mm/s), and duration (-0.052 s). These findings support the clinical feasibility and reliability of BulbiCAM for both research and patient testing, offering a promising alternative for neuro-ophthalmic assessment.

Article activity feed