Overcoming SVM Limitations in Lung Cancer Classification with Quantum Machine Learning

In this study, we compare the performance of classical Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Quantum Support Vector Machines (QSVM) on binary classification tasks, using 149 balanced datasets derived from a lung cancer diagnosis dataset. Each dataset consists of 120 samples and 12 features. Our primary objective is to evaluate whether QSVM provides measurable advantages over SVM, particularly in low-performing scenarios. To this end, we identified the 15 datasets where classical SVM exhibited the lowest F1-scores and conducted a focused comparative analysis. Results show that, in these challenging cases, QSVM achieved an average recall improvement of 99% over SVM, without compromising precision. This substantial gain in recall also led to a corresponding 48% increase in F1-score, on average. Statistical analysis using a normality test followed by a paired t-test confirmed the significance of these results. These findings suggest that QSVM can serve as a valuable alternative in situations where classical models struggle, especially when high recall is critical for early cancer detection.