Comparison of Midterm Outcomes between Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Lateral Vertebral Body Screw Fixation for Single Level Spondylolisthesis
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is aiming to compare the intra-operative, radiographic, and mid-term clinical outcomes between direct decompression of BE-TLIF and indirect decompression of OLIF in patients with single level spondylolisthesis Method: Between December 2020 and May 2022, patients with single level spondylolisthesis and received either OLIF or BE-TLIF from the authors’ orthopedic departments were selected to enroll in this retrospective study. Results: A total of 34 patients that underwent single-level OLIF and 30 patients that received single-level BE-TLIF in the spine department of our institutions were included. Both groups had similar demographic parameters. BE-TLIF showed significantly less blood loss compared to that of OLIF (p<0.001). The OLIF group yielded shorter operation time than the BE-TLIF group (p=0.002). The improvement in restoration of follow-up segmental lordosis was significantly more in OLIF group than BE-TLIF group (p<0.001). The OLIF group was significantly better in post-operative VAS back pain (p=0.035). The cage subsidence rates between the two groups were not significantly different. The follow-up Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and overall visual analogue scale were comparable between the 2 groups without significant difference. Conclusion: While OLIF still offers superior results in restoration of lumbar lordotic angle and short term post-operative back pain, the use of endoscopic technique in BE-TLIF may achieve comparable radiographic and clinical outcomes in cage subsidence rate and follow-up VAS back/leg pain compared to the indirect decompression of OLIF.